Selected engagements

AR / 04

Context beforethe claim.

Security work is shaped by systems, constraints, ownership, and timing. These field notes show the kinds of problems we help organisations structure and move forward.

Client identifiers and sensitive evidence are intentionally omitted.

01

Independent research

Open-weight AI model resistance testing

The situation

Ten local model scans needed a repeatable way to test prompt injection, system-prompt leakage, unsafe output handling, excessive agency, retrieval poisoning, and multi-turn policy drift.

OpenAIgpt-oss-20B
MetaLlama 3.1 · 3.2
QwenQwen 2.5 · 3 · 3.5
MicrosoftPhi-4
Mistral AIMistral 7B
GoogleGemma 3 4B

Our response

We ran 1,021 adversarial attempts through a controlled local harness mapped to OWASP LLM Top 10 2025, OWASP Agentic, MITRE ATLAS, and NIST AI 100-2. The run returned 320 raw detector findings for analyst validation.

Names identify model families evaluated in this controlled run. Arica is not affiliated with or endorsed by their providers. We tested local model copies—not provider services or infrastructure. Results are specific to the tested versions, prompts, runtime, and harness; they are not universal model rankings.

Discuss a similar challenge
02

VAPT

Banking infrastructure penetration testing

The situation

Legacy systems with unknown security gaps and uneven testing coverage.

Our response

Scoped penetration testing, evidence-led reporting, and prioritised remediation guidance.

Discuss a similar challenge
03

ISO 27001

Certification readiness support

The situation

Scattered documentation, unclear control ownership, and no consistent ISMS framework.

Our response

Gap analysis, policy development, risk assessment, internal-audit preparation, and certification support.

Discuss a similar challenge
04

Secure engineering

E-commerce platform security

The situation

A payment workflow required stronger protection and clearer security ownership.

Our response

Threat modelling, secure SDLC guidance, code review, and continuous testing practices.

Discuss a similar challenge
05

Assurance

Healthcare privacy and security

The situation

Fragmented systems and documentation created uncertainty around sensitive health information.

Our response

A unified compliance framework, control implementation, evidence preparation, and staff training.

Discuss a similar challenge
06

VAPT

SCADA security assessment

The situation

Industrial systems exposed attack paths through legacy protocols and weak segmentation.

Our response

Safety-conscious OT testing, network segmentation review, and ICS hardening guidance.

Discuss a similar challenge
07

DevSecOps

Secure delivery lifecycle

The situation

Rapid release cycles were creating security debt and inconsistent code review.

Our response

SAST and DAST integration, security gates, remediation workflows, and developer training.

Discuss a similar challenge
08

Enterprise

Hybrid network security assessment

The situation

Complex infrastructure made policy and exposure difficult to understand consistently.

Our response

Attack-surface assessment, validation exercises, and a sequenced remediation roadmap.

Discuss a similar challenge
09

Architecture

Zero-trust implementation

The situation

Perimeter-led security no longer matched remote work and cloud migration.

Our response

Identity-centred design, micro-segmentation, and continuous-verification controls.

Discuss a similar challenge

What the work delivers

Evidence you can work with.

Clear findings, their business impact, and the technical context your team needs to understand the exposure.

A defined response, practical priorities, and a clear next decision for the people responsible for fixing it.

Start a conversation

Your situation will be different.

That is the point. Send us the environment, constraint, deadline, or risk you are dealing with and we will shape the engagement around it.

Start a conversation